Removing redundancy in Triangulation
#172
DanielVandH
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
There is a bit of redundancy in the fields of
Triangulation
. I would like to remove thetriangles
field for example and possibly letGraph
be lazily computed (or initially empty and then populated when calls to it are made.. I don't remember where it is strictly needed in the algorithms themselves, or if I've just used it for convenience).This isn't technically breaking but I've seen a lot of calls to the
.triangles
field that it would be best to wait for 2.0 anyway.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions