Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SourceView does not highlight symbolically executed statements (sometimes) #3342

Open
unp1 opened this issue Nov 7, 2023 · 0 comments
Open
Labels
GUI HacKeYthon Candidate Issue for HacKeYthon '24 🐞 Bug

Comments

@unp1
Copy link
Member

unp1 commented Nov 7, 2023

Description

Please describe your concern in detail!

The SourceView seems not too highlight symbolically executed statements in green, if the contract to be proven is inherited.

Reproducible

Is the issue reproducible?
Select one of: always, sometimes, random, have not tried, n/a

always

Steps to reproduce

Describe the steps needed to reproduce the issue.

  1. Start KeY
  2. Load Example ...
  3. Select Dynamic Frames > List With Ghosts
  4. Choose method add and start proof
  5. Symbolically statements of add are not highlighted

What is your expected behavior and what was the actual behavior?

Additional information

Add more details here. In particular: if you have a stacktrace, put it here.


  • Commit: f9f3fff (also KeY 2.12.1)
@Drodt Drodt added the HacKeYthon Candidate Issue for HacKeYthon '24 label Jan 18, 2024
@WolframPfeifer WolframPfeifer removed the HacKeYthon Candidate Issue for HacKeYthon '24 label Jan 26, 2024
@WolframPfeifer WolframPfeifer added the HacKeYthon Candidate Issue for HacKeYthon '24 label Feb 16, 2024
@WolframPfeifer WolframPfeifer moved this to Candidate issues in 2nd HacKeYthon Feb 19, 2024
@WolframPfeifer WolframPfeifer moved this from Candidate Issue to In Progress in 2nd HacKeYthon Feb 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
GUI HacKeYthon Candidate Issue for HacKeYthon '24 🐞 Bug
Projects
Status: In Progress
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants