Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Condition of Conditional Packages #308

Open
kamlam opened this issue Oct 1, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Condition of Conditional Packages #308

kamlam opened this issue Oct 1, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@kamlam
Copy link
Contributor

kamlam commented Oct 1, 2019

Issue statement:
The condition for a Pac is already specified in the <> stereotype. Do we still need the constraints and shown in the UML diagram?

Reference: See Figure 7.5 in section 7.4 "Use of Conditional Packages" of the UML Modeling Guidelines (https://wiki.opennetworking.org/download/attachments/371294213/Draft_TR-514_UML_Modeling_Guidelines_v1.3.01.docx?version=2&modificationDate=1543499919000&api=v2)

@kamlam
Copy link
Contributor Author

kamlam commented Oct 4, 2019

2019.10.04 IISOMI Discussion:

  • Concluded that and the Constraint are duplicating the definition. Should need only one.
  • Constraint is visiable in the class diagram. <Cond: : Condition> is not visiable in the class diagram.
  • In addition, the machine readable OCL construct can be used in both cases.
  • In the call, the discussion prefer using the stereotype. Final decision is still open pending on the opinion of the other stakeholders.

@kamlam kamlam closed this as completed Oct 4, 2019
@bzeuner
Copy link
Contributor

bzeuner commented Oct 7, 2019

Was accidentally closed and then reopened.

@bzeuner bzeuner reopened this Oct 7, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants