Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RFC: Specification Version Extensions - enabling RFC functionality with requiring a full specification release #57

Open
3 of 7 tasks
Ahuge opened this issue Dec 13, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
rfc/exploring The author(s), team, and community are working together to refine and iterate on the proposal. rfc/final-comments Consensus has been reached on the RFC. A "last call" has been announced for feedback.

Comments

@Ahuge
Copy link
Contributor

Ahuge commented Dec 13, 2024

Description

How Open Job Description Specifications should be versioned and released is something that has not been talked about. This RFC proposes a way to implement RFC functionality as Extensions without requiring a new Open Job Description Specification release.
Open Job Description Specification releases can be planned on a longer term schedule while still allowing RFC functionality to be implemented and tested in the meantime.

Roles

Role User
Proposed By @Ahuge
Author(s) @Ahuge

Workflow

  • Tracking issue created (label: rfc/proposed)
  • RFC pull request submitted and ready for discussion (label: rfc/exploring)
  • Last call for comments (labels: rfc/exploring and rfc/final-comments)
  • Accepted and merged RFC pull request (label: rfc/accepted-future)
  • Green-light for inclusion in a draft specification, and the author is creating and iterating on pull requests (label: rfc/accepted-draft)
  • Pull requests are merged in to a draft specification (label: rfc/accepted-staged)
  • Officially published in a non-draft revision of the specification (label: rfc/released)

Please close this tracking issue when the proposal enters the Released stage of the process.

Open Points

For easier discovery, especially if there is a lot of discussion on this issue, then please keep this section updated
with brief summaries and pointers to the main points of discussion.


The author is responsible to progress the RFC according to this checklist, and
apply the relevant labels to this issue.

@mwiebe mwiebe added rfc/proposed A new RFC proposal. rfc/exploring The author(s), team, and community are working together to refine and iterate on the proposal. labels Dec 13, 2024
@Ahuge
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ahuge commented Jan 9, 2025

Following the RFC process, I've updated the status of #57 to rfc/final-comments. Please provide any additional feedback!

@mwiebe mwiebe added rfc/final-comments Consensus has been reached on the RFC. A "last call" has been announced for feedback. and removed rfc/proposed A new RFC proposal. labels Jan 9, 2025
@mwiebe mwiebe self-assigned this Jan 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rfc/exploring The author(s), team, and community are working together to refine and iterate on the proposal. rfc/final-comments Consensus has been reached on the RFC. A "last call" has been announced for feedback.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants