Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Standardize descriptions with consistent formatting and tone within certain Full Stack JavaScript path page elements. #4897

Open
3 of 5 tasks
4REMi opened this issue Jan 2, 2025 · 0 comments
Labels
Status: Needs Review This issue/PR needs an initial or additional review

Comments

@4REMi
Copy link

4REMi commented Jan 2, 2025

Checks

  • I have thoroughly read and understand The Odin Project Contributing Guide
  • The title of this issue follows the Feature Request: brief description of feature request format, e.g. Feature Request: Add a dark mode to the website
  • Would you like to work on this issue?

Description of the Feature Request

When users visit the Full Stack JavaScript path page, they should be able to read consistent and standardized descriptions for all courses within the path.

To illustrate this structure, the current description of the JavaScript course serves as a good reference:

"Make your websites dynamic and interactive with JavaScript!"
Purpose: States the course’s main focus: teaching students how to make websites dynamic and interactive.

"You'll create features and standalone applications."
Learning Objectives: It gives learners a clear idea of what they’ll accomplish by the end of the course.

"This module includes projects where you will learn how to manipulate the DOM, use object-oriented programming principles, and fetch real-world data using APIs."
Content: This outlines the specific topics and skills that will be covered.

Currently, the descriptions for the following courses could be improved to match this level of detail and consistency:

Intermediate HTML and CSS: The description is too brief, only providing a general idea of the content without specific mention of the key topics.

Advanced HTML and CSS: Similar to the previous module, this description lacks detailed examples of what makes it "advanced".

React: While the description mentions React as a popular JavaScript library, it doesn’t elaborate on what specific skills or projects students will work on.

While these modules provide a general idea of their content, their descriptions are shorter and less descriptive compared to others in the path, like JavaScript.

Acceptance criteria

  • Rewritten descriptions include specific examples of the topics, technologies, and skills learners will gain.
    Purpose: A concise opening sentence introducing the course.
    Content: Key skills or topics covered.
    Learning Objectives: What learners will achieve.

  • Each description is between 40-60 words, ensuring enough detail without being overly verbose.

Additional Comments

No response

@4REMi 4REMi added the Status: Needs Review This issue/PR needs an initial or additional review label Jan 2, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to 📋 Backlog / Ideas in Main Site Jan 2, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Status: Needs Review This issue/PR needs an initial or additional review
Projects
Status: 📋 Backlog / Ideas
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant