Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

model evaluation #7

Open
mars203030 opened this issue Feb 12, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

model evaluation #7

mars203030 opened this issue Feb 12, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@mars203030
Copy link

Hello,

do you have teh code for model evaluation

Regards,

@jingyeyang95
Copy link
Collaborator

Hello, for model evaluation, we randomly hold out 20% of the Biolark-gcs dataset, which you can get from https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/v4t59p8w4z/2
We manually compared the generated results with the dataset's labels for better accuracy. Specifically, we load our pre-trained model and give it text data from biolark as a prompt. The PhenoGPT will generate (predict) phenotypes and HPO IDs. You can compare these directly with the true results for evaluation.

@mars203030
Copy link
Author

Thank you so much this is what I am intended too
I tried the code you posted for llama 2 but it seems I am not getting any answer.
is there a step I am missing

@mars203030
Copy link
Author

here is wandb results
image
image

@kaichop
Copy link
Contributor

kaichop commented Nov 11, 2024

are there any update on the evaluation? Please note that the phenogpt has been updated a few times and you may try the new version as well.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants