You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for follow-up! No, the weight of RealBasicVSR is not finetuned. It is the same one from the originial repo. Meanwhile, if you wanna compare to your own dataset, I'd recommend trying to plug in Upscale-a-video as video prior in SuperGaussian, which could give better results than RealBasicVSR. They recently released checkpoint and codebase.
Thanks for your work and open-source. I tried upscale-a-video prior in SuperGaussian. But the quantitative results are not as good as RealBasicVSR without fine-tuning. Do you have any suggestions about the hyper-parameters when using upscale-a-video?
The quantitative results I obtained are given as follow:
LPIPS: 0.2518 NIQE: 9.2263 FID: 48.46
The hyper-parameters of Upscale-a-video are set as:
-n 30, -g 1 -s 20.
BTW, I noticed higher noise level or higher CFG scale will leads to over-saturated artifacts and inconsistency between views.
Thank you for your great work.
I have a simple question about RealBasicVSR which is provided in the README.md.
Is the model weight fine-tuned one, or the pre-trained one from its original repo?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: