We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Discussed the test of epsilon with @eimrek
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, just to have a reply on this issue:
I tested epsilon and nu for "Fr2O5" directly in https://github.com/aiidateam/acwf-verification-scripts/blob/main/acwf_paper_plots/plots/supplementary/periodic_tables_all/generate_all_periodic_table.py
and they matched with my javascript implementation (using gaussian quadrature), given here: https://github.com/materialscloud-org/acwf-verification/blob/main/src/components/ComparisonMeasures.js
(numbers also available at https://acwf-verification.materialscloud.org)
Should there be any more thorough testing?
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Discussed the test of epsilon with @eimrek
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: