Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Perturbation Project #279

Open
tonywu1999 opened this issue Dec 19, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Perturbation Project #279

tonywu1999 opened this issue Dec 19, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@tonywu1999
Copy link
Collaborator

tonywu1999 commented Dec 19, 2024

Aim of the project

The question of whether results of one perturbation experiment can be applied to predict the results of a future perturbation experiment in a different context remains a challenge in MS proteomics. For example, can we predict the effect of a gene knockout on protein abundance in a cell line in one lab based on how that drug affected the same cell line in another lab? This question remains a challenge since every MS proteomics experiment can have systematic differences, to the point where there is day to day variation within the same lab.

This project aims to formalize the framework for predicting the outcome of perturbations in future experiments based on past experiments. Some questions we aim to address include:

  • Given perturbation data in one experiment, what conditions make it possible to predict the effect of a different perturbation for a new experiment?
  • How similar must the experimental factors of 2 experiments be to ensure it is practical to transport insights from one context to another? e.g. transporting insights from one cell line to another cell line may be possible, but may not be as feasible between different organs or species.

Dataset Preferences

  • We ideally would like datasets involving protein degraders or gene knockouts (i.e. any perturbation that directly affects protein abundance, so unfortunately not kinase inhibitors).
  • To ease initial analysis, we focus on transportability of results across labs analyzing the same cell line (e.g. HEK293 seems popular)
  • Datasets with high number of replicates, multiple perturbations, and/or multiple cell lines are preferred

Datasets

This table will be constantly updated with new datasets and order of preference for annotation.

PRIDE ID Paper ID Number of Replicates Per Group Conditions Cell Lines Perturbation Main Target Acquisition Type
PXD053502 PMID39392888 3 drug/control HEK293 MZ-1 (degrader) BRD4 DIA
PXD047934 PMID38958654 3 drug1-4/control HEK293 CC-885 (degrader), ACBI-8451+ACBI-0068 (synthesized degraders) GSPT1, CDK4 TMT
PXD041200 N/A 4 drug/control miniTurboID-CRBN HEK293 Flp-In Lenalidomide (degrader) CK1α DIA
PXD041128 N/A 3 drug/control TurboID-CRBN HEK293 Flp-In CC-885 (degrader) GSPT1 DIA
PXD041047 N/A 3 drug/control TurboID-CRBN HEK293 Flp-In pomalidomide (degrader) ZF DIA
PXD041097 N/A 4 drug/control TurboID-CRBN HEK293 Flp-In Thalidomide (degrader) ZF DIA
PXD041081 N/A 4 drug/control TurboID-CRBN HEK293 Flp-In Iberdomide (degrader) IKZF1/IKZF3 DIA
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant