You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Still too early in reverse engineering the RT4 format to know how valuable this might be, but I can imagine a use case for settings / values that represent read-only properties like created_date, firmware_revision, and header , and that these aren't necessarily best represented as RetroTinkSetting objects.
One approach could be to add a read-only property to RetroTinkSetting.
Another would be to maintain a separate metadata: RetroTinkSettings property of RetroTinkProfile that contains the definitions for all of the read-only values in the RT4.
Whatever path we choose, we must consider how we can best prevent / discourage developers from attempting to update those values.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Still too early in reverse engineering the RT4 format to know how valuable this might be, but I can imagine a use case for settings / values that represent read-only properties like
created_date
,firmware_revision
, andheader
, and that these aren't necessarily best represented asRetroTinkSetting
objects.One approach could be to add a
read-only
property toRetroTinkSetting
.Another would be to maintain a separate
metadata: RetroTinkSettings
property ofRetroTinkProfile
that contains the definitions for all of the read-only values in the RT4.Whatever path we choose, we must consider how we can best prevent / discourage developers from attempting to update those values.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: