Can we archive this repo?

[bethac07]

@shntnu , we no longer use this repo for building BBBC, and its dependencies are out of date. I've pulled the open PRs dependabot made to fix this, but eventually, they will fall out of date again (and they then generate annoying emails).

We presumably don't want to spend time keeping this up to date. As far as I can tell, the only active/useful things are

1. The instructions for editing OpenScholar, which we can keep in our wiki anyway and
2. Add CDRP dataset as BBBC047 #61, where we seem to be keeping active notes for BBBC047 and which the actual BBBC page is set to point to discuss this set.

Could we move that discussion to ie the 2017_Bray repo or somewhere else and put this repo in archive status? "No" is a perfectly fine answer but just wondering.

[shntnu]

How about we hollow out the repo #95, but keep it active so that you / the world can use it to track issues with the datasets (like with #61?)

With the C-lab managing BBBC going forward, you have full veto/decision powers :) So feel free to make a call on this

[bledford87]

Just a note that I've updated the ReadMe somewhat related to this (and a previous task I had for noting that websites were managed via OpenScholar now). There are some open issues related to posting datasets that are still actually open (we're waiting for info/data), but those could be moved to the "Website Updates" Zenkit, if preferred.