You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think we should include that information. To store the site-level depth (total depth) is simple, if it is provided in the VCF file (DP field). I added an issue to bystro-vcf to do so.
To store the data per-sample is harder, because it would probably require us to add a large amount of information to the output.
Would we want that information within the annotation output, or as a distinct file?
If a distinct file, how should we handle search indexing?
For per-sample information, I think we may be moving to a separate output, and allow users to search both the sample-level output and the variant-level (current annotation) output.
Would you be interested in helping me work through the per-sample question together with Cristina?
Alex,
Is there any proposal to also include the depth of coverage statistics in the summary output?
thanks!!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: