Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Proposing new OSF repository #179

Open
josephmje opened this issue Aug 12, 2021 · 6 comments
Open

Proposing new OSF repository #179

josephmje opened this issue Aug 12, 2021 · 6 comments

Comments

@josephmje
Copy link
Contributor

josephmje commented Aug 12, 2021

If we move to using NeuroLibre to host this content, we will be using Repo2Data to download the pre-processed data from OSF. Repo2Data cannot use the fetch command to download specific files and instead using the clone command to download all of the files from an OSF repository.

Can we migrate the existing ds000221_sub-010006.zip file to its own OSF repository?

@kaitj @jhlegarreta

@kaitj
Copy link
Collaborator

kaitj commented Aug 12, 2021

Definitely. I think we can link the two repositories anyways, so we can remove the zip file from the existing and keep it on the separate repo (will have to update existing scripts/instructions/actions).

@jhlegarreta
Copy link
Contributor

I'd be fine moving the subject data to its own OSF repository if the move takes place,.

@josephmje
Copy link
Contributor Author

josephmje commented Aug 12, 2021

Awesome! Datalad also now has an OSF extension. Should we consider using this to stay consistent with the IntroMRI lesson and also continue pushing the concepts of dataset version control?

It would allow us to use datalad clone osf://<osf_project// to download the data.

@kaitj
Copy link
Collaborator

kaitj commented Aug 12, 2021

That sounds good to me - I think when this first started there wasn't an extension yet.

Since this is a relatively quick and easy change, I've gone ahead and created a new OSF repo for this and linked it with the old one (data is still present on both for now). The new repo is here: https://osf.io/t7afj/

It follows the same structure as before ds000221_subject/ds000221_sub-010006.zip

We will have to update the scripts and instructions.

@jhlegarreta
Copy link
Contributor

Sounds good for advocating in favor for datalad. Please, correct if I'm wrong, but using datalad is then independent of the NeuroLibre hosting, right?

Also, I'd avoid mixing datalad with the binder-related issues in #178: I'd leave transitioning to datalad to a separate, dedicated PR. Otherwise, we'd be introducing further inconsistencies.

@josephmje
Copy link
Contributor Author

Using datalad would also tie into NeuroLibre hosting. If we create a new repository on OSF, we would need to use the datalad OSF extension in order to push the data. And also, this changes what we include in the dataset json file, which contains instructions for downloading the data.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants