Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

mappers clip/reject modes #2

Open
reno- opened this issue Apr 16, 2012 · 3 comments
Open

mappers clip/reject modes #2

reno- opened this issue Apr 16, 2012 · 3 comments

Comments

@reno-
Copy link
Member

reno- commented Apr 16, 2012

  • be able to choose "clip" mode (current) or "split/reject" mode in mappers
  • in clip mode when an input is out of bounds it is clipped either to the highest or lowest value
  • in split/reject mode, when an input is out of bounds it is not passed on.
@tmays
Copy link
Member

tmays commented Apr 16, 2012

Not easy to implement without breaking a lot of existing mappings. In order to keep existing events compatible, the only solution I see is to add the parameter "reject" or "scale reject" to the mapping param list, such that if there is no value for it in the list, "reject" will be automatically "off" and the clip mode will be "clip" as it is now. This will also be simpler to put into the editor since we won't have to worry about "default".

In the long term, in tapemovie2, I think we should go to the "clip mode" logic with maybe a symbol saying "clip" or "reject", but for tapemovie1, I would prefer to go with the less intrusive solution. Is that ok with you?

@tmays
Copy link
Member

tmays commented Apr 16, 2012

Merry Christmas!
added: clipmode param within multimap and multimapsend, multimap.edit and multimapsendu.edit
options are (for the moment) clip and reject.
Old event messages will automatically be in "clip".
I tested, but should test yourself to be sure.

@reno-
Copy link
Member Author

reno- commented Apr 16, 2012

Excellent !!
Juste to notify that this report was just an imPort from issues of old-tapemovie.org tracker !!

But I agree, we have to focus on span and tapemovie 2 For development!!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants