You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Add aesthetic-rating aided dataset support into the discriminator loss function.
Add a function that could penalize the discriminator for thinking an image from the dataset is "more real" than one which has a higher aesthetic-score rating (could be an aesthetic score system beetwen 1 to 5 or 1 to 10). We could organize a dataset based on aesthetic scores by seperating them into seperate folders (example : folders named 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 , for 1-10 aesthetic score rating).
This would greatly help use-cases where you have a lot of images for a dataset but only a select few are good enough in quality and creativity, but you still wanna keep the diversity of a much larger dataset.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Add aesthetic-rating aided dataset support into the discriminator loss function.
Add a function that could penalize the discriminator for thinking an image from the dataset is "more real" than one which has a higher aesthetic-score rating (could be an aesthetic score system beetwen 1 to 5 or 1 to 10). We could organize a dataset based on aesthetic scores by seperating them into seperate folders (example : folders named 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 , for 1-10 aesthetic score rating).
This would greatly help use-cases where you have a lot of images for a dataset but only a select few are good enough in quality and creativity, but you still wanna keep the diversity of a much larger dataset.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: