Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Any interest in adding web server OTA mode? #232

Open
rdragonrydr opened this issue Mar 11, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Any interest in adding web server OTA mode? #232

rdragonrydr opened this issue Mar 11, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
back burner Low priority nice-to-haves enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed
Milestone

Comments

@rdragonrydr
Copy link

A tool I use at times is the ability to upload a .bin file directly to the web server rather than via the IDE's OTA utility.
A quick search has revealed two different options for the ESP32 (I'm familiar with the ESP8266).

Would either of these be something you'd mind me adding? They wouldn't port perfectly; I'd need to customize for the camera de-init (which is a point for the second option), but these get the idea across.

(library)
https://randomnerdtutorials.com/esp32-ota-over-the-air-vs-code/
(manual)
https://github.com/RuiSantosdotme/Random-Nerd-Tutorials/blob/master/Projects/ESP32/OTA_Web_Updater.ino

@easytarget easytarget added enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed back burner Low priority nice-to-haves labels Mar 11, 2022
@easytarget easytarget added this to the 4.x milestone Mar 11, 2022
@easytarget
Copy link
Owner

easytarget commented Mar 11, 2022

Yes it is a good idea, (actually, it's already on the 'trivial' wishlist in the readme)
..and if I had failed to track down the problem I was having with ArduinoOTA that would have been my solution.

But.. not for this release. And not without some sort of simple password protection. It's ideal to blend into a release that also adds wifi functions (such as those in #212)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
back burner Low priority nice-to-haves enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants