feat(bpdm-gate-pool): MVP hierarchy data model adjustment

[HeyHardy]

GitHub Issue #754

User Story: Hierarchy Management for BPNLs in Catena-X Portal

As a Company Admin,
I want to manage hierarchies for Business Partner Number Lists (BPNLs) in the Catena-X Portal,
so that I can effectively organize and control the relationships between different BPNLs.

Acceptance Criteria:

1. CRUD Operations:

   • Create: Ability to create a new hierarchy type “Is Managed in Catena-X Portal By” with "valid from" and "valid to" attributes.
   • Read: Display all hierarchy types, including “Is Managed in Catena-X Portal By” with their details.
   • Update: Allow editing of existing hierarchies by changing the "valid from" and "valid to" dates.
   • Delete: Allow deletion of hierarchies when no longer needed.

2. Hierarchy Types:

   • Initial support for “Is Managed in Catena-X Portal By”.
   • Future implementation for additional types: “Is Registered Alternative For” and “Is Replaced By”.
   • Ensure that each BPNL can support multiple hierarchy types.

3. Relationship Types:

   • Implement relationship types “public” and “non-public”.
   • Default relationship type should be “non-public”.
   • Company Admins can set and change the relationship type of a BPNL-BPNL relation.

4. Functional Requirements for the Pool and Gate Datamodel:

   • Sequence for CRUD of hierarchies: Portal UI ==> Portal Gate ==> Pool.
   • Needed attributes: "valid to" and "valid from".
   • Initial hierarchy type: “Is Managed in Catena-X Portal By”.
   • Future hierarchy types: “Is Registered Alternative For”, “Is Replaced By”.
   • Support for multiple hierarchy types for each BPNL.
   • Relationship types: "public" and "non-public" (default: "non-public").
   • Admin roles: Full access to create and edit hierarchies.
   • Standard users: View-only access to hierarchies.

5. Data Modeling and Integration:

   • Adjust BPDM payload structure to include fields for new hierarchy types.
   • Ensure data model schema is updated to support the required hierarchy fields.

[Sebastian-Wurm]

@HeyHardy: This seems to be the implementation user story of the MVP. Shouldn't we move that from sig-release to bpdm?

[HeyHardy]

obsolete, work on here
eclipse-tractusx/bpdm#1027

[nicoprow]

@HeyHardy since this issue is obsolete I will close it. Tell me if there is worth in keeping it open