Why We Should Stop or Change Mandatory ZAP DAST Scans #73
scherersebastian
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 1 comment
-
@scherersebastian : Yes, we had detailed look into the ZAP tool and have already made a note that we will not mandate the use to perform authenticated scans. The decision on whether we exclude ZAP or to exclude DAST Scans itself is under consideration. It will be notified soon. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Forcing ZAP DAST scans has made things tough for developers, who often deal with integration problems on their own. This ZAP workflow
https://github.com/eclipse-tractusx/puris/blob/ci/delete-veracode/.github/workflows/owasp-dast.yaml
isn't bad itself, but it's not giving us the results we need.
This isn't the developers' fault—they're just doing what they're told without much help.
This isn't useful.
I suggest we either get rid of the DAST Quality Gate or change it to help our developers better.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions