You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
While investigating #19 , I read the .bru and .dat files for
pproj 33 = uvp5_sn002zd_cascade2011
psampleid 11531 = cx01_14, raw = HDR20110313090333
I recomputed the number of blobs and their mean area and mean meangrey from the bru and compared those with the starts in the dat. This table shows the content of the dat + the last 3 columns which are my recomputation from the bru.
Is it expected that the number of blobs is higher in the dat? In the bru, the smallest area is 4 pixels. Can the difference come from the fact that the info for the smallest objects (4 pixels) is not stored in the bru?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
While investigating #19 , I read the
.bru
and.dat
files forpproj 33 = uvp5_sn002zd_cascade2011
psampleid 11531 = cx01_14, raw = HDR20110313090333
I recomputed the number of blobs and their mean area and mean meangrey from the
bru
and compared those with the starts in thedat
. This table shows the content of thedat
+ the last 3 columns which are my recomputation from thebru
.Is it expected that the number of blobs is higher in the
dat
? In the bru, the smallest area is 4 pixels. Can the difference come from the fact that the info for the smallest objects (4 pixels) is not stored in thebru
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: