You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
nextflow run epi2me-labs/wf-clone-validation
--fastq /Users/jameslloyd/Documents/Main_Work_JPBL/LL/BULLYWUG/2024-12-19_James_plasmids/fastq_pass_cat/BigTest01
--sample_sheet /Users/jameslloyd/Documents/Main_Work_JPBL/LL/BULLYWUG/2024-12-19_James_plasmids/fastq_pass_cat/BigTest01/sample_sheet_BigTest01.csv
--out_dir /Users/jameslloyd/Documents/Main_Work_JPBL/LL/BULLYWUG/2024-12-19_James_plasmids/fastq_pass_cat/BigTest01.2_output
Workflow Execution - CLI Execution Profile
standard (default)
What happened?
I have found that the output of wf-clone-validation is stochastic, not deterministic, and that sometimes the output is a mis-assembly, and others, it is accurate to expected. Sometimes the errors are small indels but other times very large (repeated) plasmids are the output. I think that this is related to the use of Flye but I cannot use Canu on MacOS. When I run the same command 5 times (only change is the location of the output directory), I will see different results for some plasmids. Interesting, of my 12 test plasmids, some are always assembled the same, but others are not. This could be related to how pure the clone is? If a mutation has occurred before plasmid purification, then perhaps that partly explains the issue. Size of the plasmid may also be a factor. I always saw good in silico assemblies for the larger plasmids (8-20 Kb) rather than the smaller ones (<4 Kb).
At the moment I need to run the workflow a couple of times at least to be confident about at least one of the assembly for some of the plasmids, rather than just looking at the output of one and thinking "oh no, it is bad". It would be good if this could be improved. Perhaps this is a feature request rather than bug report.
Relevant log output
N E X T F L O W ~ version 24.10.3
Launching `https://github.com/epi2me-labs/wf-clone-validation` [tiny_poitras] DSL2 - revision: 5b0d7357de [master]
|||||||||| _____ ____ ___ ____ __ __ _____ _ _
||||||||||| ____| _ \_ _|___ \|\/| ____||| __ _||__ ___
|||||| _|||_) || __) ||\/|| _| _____||/ _`|'_ \/ __|||||| | |___| __/| | / __/| | | | |__|_____| | (_| | |_) \__ \|||||||||| |_____|_| |___|_____|_| |_|_____| |_|\__,_|_.__/|___/|||||||||| wf-clone-validation v1.7.1-g5b0d735--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Core Nextflow options revision : master runName : tiny_poitras containerEngine: docker container : [withLabel:wfplasmid:ontresearch/wf-clone-validation:sha55e97540ca3ca4f06310269c2ebd3175e1e9352a, withLabel:canu:ontresearch/canu:shabbdea3813f6fb436ea0cbaa19958ad772db9154c, withLabel:medaka:ontresearch/medaka:sha447c70a639b8bcf17dc49b51e74dfcde6474837b, withLabel:wf_common:ontresearch/wf-common:shaabceef445fb63214073cbf5836fdd33c04be4ac7, withLabel:plannotate:ontresearch/plannotate:shaf7f37f751dd0bc529121b765fb63322502288a03] launchDir : /Users/jameslloyd/Documents/Main_Work_JPBL/LL/BULLYWUG/2024-12-19_James_plasmids/fastq_pass_cat workDir : /Users/jameslloyd/Documents/Main_Work_JPBL/LL/BULLYWUG/2024-12-19_James_plasmids/fastq_pass_cat/work projectDir : /Users/jameslloyd/.nextflow/assets/epi2me-labs/wf-clone-validation userName : jameslloyd profile : standard configFiles : /Users/jameslloyd/.nextflow/assets/epi2me-labs/wf-clone-validation/nextflow.configInput Options fastq : /Users/jameslloyd/Documents/Main_Work_JPBL/LL/BULLYWUG/2024-12-19_James_plasmids/fastq_pass_cat/BigTest01Sample Options sample_sheet : /Users/jameslloyd/Documents/Main_Work_JPBL/LL/BULLYWUG/2024-12-19_James_plasmids/fastq_pass_cat/BigTest01/sample_sheet_BigTest01.csvOutput Options out_dir : /Users/jameslloyd/Documents/Main_Work_JPBL/LL/BULLYWUG/2024-12-19_James_plasmids/fastq_pass_cat/BigTest01.2_output!! Only displaying parameters that differ from the pipeline defaults !!--------------------------------------------------------------------------------If you use epi2me-labs/wf-clone-validation for your analysis please cite:* The nf-core framework https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-0439-x--------------------------------------------------------------------------------This is epi2me-labs/wf-clone-validation v1.7.1-g5b0d735.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Searching input for [.fastq, .fastq.gz, .fq, .fq.gz] files.executor > local (180)[8d/3b5d2b] validate_sample_sheet [100%] 1 of 1 ✔[d3/cfed9a] fastcat (11) [100%] 12 of 12 ✔[- ] cutsite_qc -[- ] pipeline:filterHostReads -[d5/ff3fa8] pipeline:checkIfEnoughReads (11) [100%] 12 of 12 ✔[79/bf12bf] pipeline:assembleCore (10) [100%] 21 of 21, failed: 9, retries: 9 ✔[b9/b464c2] pipeline:medakaPolishAssembly (10) [100%] 10 of 10 ✔[a3/6733cf] pipeline:reorientateFastqAndGetFasta (10) [100%] 10 of 10 ✔[bb/857b80] pipeline:downsampledStats (12) [100%] 12 of 12 ✔[27/8e65ae] pipeline:findPrimers (10) [100%] 10 of 10 ✔[04/baafed] pipeline:medakaVersion [100%] 1 of 1 ✔[53/628590] pipeline:flyeVersion [100%] 1 of 1 ✔[92/ae1a29] pipeline:getVersions [100%] 1 of 1 ✔[de/b26257] pipeline:getParams [100%] 1 of 1 ✔[5d/94d5b2] pipeline:assembly_qc (10) [100%] 10 of 10 ✔[f3/ed737a] pipeline:inserts (1) [100%] 1 of 1 ✔[- ] pipeline:insert_qc -[- ] pipeline:align_assembly -[- ] pipeline:assembly_comparison -[07/ecbbfd] pipeline:runPlannotate (1) [100%] 1 of 1 ✔[aa/bd819c] pipeline:assemblyMafs (10) [100%] 10 of 10 ✔[ef/f2ebd7] pipeline:report (1) [100%] 1 of 1 ✔[40/70c00d] publish (65) [100%] 65 of 65 ✔Completed at: 13-Jan-2025 05:49:50Duration : 15m 23sCPU hours : 1.5 (16.8% failed)Succeeded : 171Failed : 9
Application activity log entry
No response
Were you able to successfully run the latest version of the workflow with the demo data?
no
Other demo data information
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Operating System
macOS
Other Linux
No response
Workflow Version
v1.7.1-g5b0d735
Workflow Execution
Command line (Local)
Other workflow execution
No response
EPI2ME Version
v1.7.1-g5b0d735
CLI command run
nextflow run epi2me-labs/wf-clone-validation
--fastq /Users/jameslloyd/Documents/Main_Work_JPBL/LL/BULLYWUG/2024-12-19_James_plasmids/fastq_pass_cat/BigTest01
--sample_sheet /Users/jameslloyd/Documents/Main_Work_JPBL/LL/BULLYWUG/2024-12-19_James_plasmids/fastq_pass_cat/BigTest01/sample_sheet_BigTest01.csv
--out_dir /Users/jameslloyd/Documents/Main_Work_JPBL/LL/BULLYWUG/2024-12-19_James_plasmids/fastq_pass_cat/BigTest01.2_output
Workflow Execution - CLI Execution Profile
standard (default)
What happened?
I have found that the output of wf-clone-validation is stochastic, not deterministic, and that sometimes the output is a mis-assembly, and others, it is accurate to expected. Sometimes the errors are small indels but other times very large (repeated) plasmids are the output. I think that this is related to the use of Flye but I cannot use Canu on MacOS. When I run the same command 5 times (only change is the location of the output directory), I will see different results for some plasmids. Interesting, of my 12 test plasmids, some are always assembled the same, but others are not. This could be related to how pure the clone is? If a mutation has occurred before plasmid purification, then perhaps that partly explains the issue. Size of the plasmid may also be a factor. I always saw good in silico assemblies for the larger plasmids (8-20 Kb) rather than the smaller ones (<4 Kb).
At the moment I need to run the workflow a couple of times at least to be confident about at least one of the assembly for some of the plasmids, rather than just looking at the output of one and thinking "oh no, it is bad". It would be good if this could be improved. Perhaps this is a feature request rather than bug report.
Relevant log output
Application activity log entry
No response
Were you able to successfully run the latest version of the workflow with the demo data?
no
Other demo data information
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: