Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Return sliders into llama-server settings interface #11145

Open
4 tasks done
DaLiV opened this issue Jan 8, 2025 · 2 comments
Open
4 tasks done

Feature Request: Return sliders into llama-server settings interface #11145

DaLiV opened this issue Jan 8, 2025 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@DaLiV
Copy link

DaLiV commented Jan 8, 2025

Prerequisites

  • I am running the latest code. Mention the version if possible as well.
  • I carefully followed the README.md.
  • I searched using keywords relevant to my issue to make sure that I am creating a new issue that is not already open (or closed).
  • I reviewed the Discussions, and have a new and useful enhancement to share.

Feature Description

Missing OLD UI functions :

  1. instead of entry of values on older builds was possible to adjust with sliders
  2. possibility to enter next prompt without stopping current response

Motivation

more comfortable UI

Possible Implementation

last build was [b4038](https://github.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp/releases/tag/b4038
No response

@DaLiV DaLiV added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 8, 2025
@ngxson
Copy link
Collaborator

ngxson commented Jan 9, 2025

IMO I don't like sliders because it's hard to select a value precisely. Also, it makes the UI looks very cramped, given that we have many input boxes, not just temperature/top_k/top_p like on openai playground

@DaLiV
Copy link
Author

DaLiV commented Jan 9, 2025

therefore that can be combined
slider+"input"

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants