Repository navigation
[Issue Arborist] Run report #2411
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
|
This discussion has been marked as outdated by Issue Arborist. A newer discussion is available at Discussion #2414. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
🌳 Issue Arborist Report
Issues analyzed: 70
Parent issues created
None. No new orphan cluster of 5+ issues without an existing parent.
Links created
deps-release-notesaction-item issues, which is the theme of #1283.Suggested (not linked — for maintainer review)
custom-fieldsis compile-time only, so runtime-computed values never reach ADO #2044 and [agent-issue]: support declarative Azure DevOps pipeline variables in workflow source #2012 are all about agent-supplied or declarative values, such as work-item fields and pipeline variables. They may share a parent, but the relationship is not clear enough to link.git -cconfig override #2331, 🔴 Red Team Audit — High: link-work-items area-path target scope silently fail-opens #2261 and 🔴 Red Team Audit — High: Shell injection via runtimes.lean.toolchain #855 are red-team security audits. There are only 3, so I left them unlinked.Observations
[Parent]issues already exist ([Parent] Compiler internals and pipeline generation improvements (IR types, YAML gen, prompt decoupling) #1286, [Parent] MCPG infrastructure and safe-output tooling improvements #1321, [Parent] Safe-output executor E2E test coverage and tool correctness #1428, [Parent] Track and resolve recurring agentic workflow execution failures (non-rate-limit) #1549, [Parent] Track and resolve recurring AI-credits rate-limit failures in scheduled agentic workflows #1535, [Parent] Track agent runtime and execution pipeline improvements #1649, [Parent] Issue Arborist - Issue Group #1284). I did not link children to them because membership was ambiguous.All reactions