Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Average treatment effect for lm forest #1384

Open
fresskylin opened this issue Jan 23, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Average treatment effect for lm forest #1384

fresskylin opened this issue Jan 23, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@fresskylin
Copy link

I am now using the lm_forest() function to estimate multiple continuous treatment effects. I am interested in estimating the average treatment effect using this function. Is there any way to help compute the average treatment effect for lm_forest() based on the grf package?

@erikcs
Copy link
Member

erikcs commented Feb 21, 2024

Hi @fresskylin, not currently, it would depend on exactly how you are using lm_forest. In the future we could consider making a tutorial that covers some estimands you could target with lm_forest and how to construct doubly robust averages of these.

@JFLmkt
Copy link

JFLmkt commented Nov 30, 2024

Hi @fresskylin, not currently, it would depend on exactly how you are using lm_forest. In the future we could consider making a tutorial that covers some estimands you could target with lm_forest and how to construct doubly robust averages of these.

Hi @erikcs, we are using a similar approach that needs average partial effect estimates from lm_forest. Let's say it is an experiment with multiple continuous/binary treatments. I think this is also linked to #1330

We understand that it takes some time to implement the function in the package, but before that would you mind sharing some math regarding doubly robust scores construction so that we can write customized codes for our own? My sense is that they should be close to what you did for continuous treatments in Causal Forest, and many required information has been shown in the output of lm_forest.

Many thanks for your help!

@erikcs
Copy link
Member

erikcs commented Dec 2, 2024

Hi @JFLmkt, Graham & Pinto (2022) consider doubly robust constructions for many average partial effects, and the answer should be in there somewhere.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants