You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am now using the lm_forest() function to estimate multiple continuous treatment effects. I am interested in estimating the average treatment effect using this function. Is there any way to help compute the average treatment effect for lm_forest() based on the grf package?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @fresskylin, not currently, it would depend on exactly how you are using lm_forest. In the future we could consider making a tutorial that covers some estimands you could target with lm_forest and how to construct doubly robust averages of these.
Hi @fresskylin, not currently, it would depend on exactly how you are using lm_forest. In the future we could consider making a tutorial that covers some estimands you could target with lm_forest and how to construct doubly robust averages of these.
Hi @erikcs, we are using a similar approach that needs average partial effect estimates from lm_forest. Let's say it is an experiment with multiple continuous/binary treatments. I think this is also linked to #1330
We understand that it takes some time to implement the function in the package, but before that would you mind sharing some math regarding doubly robust scores construction so that we can write customized codes for our own? My sense is that they should be close to what you did for continuous treatments in Causal Forest, and many required information has been shown in the output of lm_forest.
I am now using the lm_forest() function to estimate multiple continuous treatment effects. I am interested in estimating the average treatment effect using this function. Is there any way to help compute the average treatment effect for lm_forest() based on the grf package?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: