-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Relations of the Main elements #19
Comments
Eclass Eversion and Eclassirdi are basically attributes and not specific to RoleClass. So no they cant be included unless we want it then we will have to give specific name to attributes. |
I do not mean
In this case, there is one RoleClass and two Attributes. Say we want to randomly generate |
yes please close it |
Would be possible to model this information in a way that we can make the generator extensible? For example, if we want to have the generator for AML, we would plug-in an AML-related ontology or RDF description and the generator would work. If we want another, e.g., OPC UA, and the ontology contains what is needed then the generator will work as well. What do you think? |
Difficult with Rdf but might be possible with XSD. |
Yes, it is based on XSD, but our center language is RDF. Our examples have been developed in XML, thus we have used XSD-based solutions but they can be CSV, text, etc and, for them, RDF would be the same. If we have our conceptualization of the model in RDF/OWL then we can map it from any language we used. Therefore, we can do it with XSD - RDF as well. |
Just to clarify the current process of the generator, it generates the XML examples given its XSD mapping. Secondly , by XSD i mean the process is not automatic, we get the XSD file and generate java classes based on XSD and modify our generator. Now reading your comment, your idea is instead of XSD, we use RDF/OWL ontology to do the generation because some formats might not have xsd but another format such as csv, text e.t.c. So the generator would basically generate RDF examples based on the ontology. Please confirm me if i am on right path. |
Is the relation of
RoleClass - Attributes
covered?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: