Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make Robohive useable in Kitchen Environment #3

Open
Toradus opened this issue Mar 14, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Make Robohive useable in Kitchen Environment #3

Toradus opened this issue Mar 14, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Toradus
Copy link
Collaborator

Toradus commented Mar 14, 2024

The current starting position of the default simulation is located inside the Kitchen (nearly the same cartesian coords as the robot resting pose ).
We need to either create a new clean simulation (e.g. copy the one from SimulationFramework, where the starting position is located somewhere else, or implement a simulation of the Kitchen environment. The XML + Assets for the kitchen env are already created (Max / Marcel have them), feel free to ask for a copy if you want to implement it.

@Toradus Toradus added bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request labels Mar 14, 2024
@omeryagmurlu
Copy link

If we start polymetis with the correct configuration (eg resting pose set correctly: intuitive-robots/irl_polymetis#5 (comment)), then this is a non-issue since robohive uses the resting pose from polymetis by default:

reset_pos = torch.Tensor(self.robot.metadata.rest_pose)

@Toradus
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Toradus commented Mar 20, 2024

Hmm, we need to recheck this!
From my memory the simulation starts in a slightly different location then the resting pose and the robot always made a small "jump" from resting_pose -> sim_start_pose
Maybe the simulation is just configurated wrong and provides a "reset_pos" to the reset command you linked.

@Toradus
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Toradus commented Mar 20, 2024

Yeah, we simply have to adapt this line
good catch!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants