-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Method to remove series inductance in dual_fit_eis? #6
Comments
Hi, thanks for the kind feedback! You can enable or disable inductance by setting the
Note: you can also toggle ohmic resistance and capacitance in the same way with the attributes
The good news is that you can take a conventional DRT estimate (obtained with fit_eis) and convert it to a custom discrete element model by using the DRT to identify initial parameter estimates and bounds. The code to do so:
The DiscreteElementModel class is also a fully functional ECM fitting class that can be used without an initial DRT estimate. It uses analytical Jacobian calculations to improve fit accuracy and speed. For example:
|
Hi! Hybrid DRT has been great so far, thanks for your contribution to the community!
I have tried fitting my data using RQs using impedance.py and was able to get better fits as I do not use a series inductance parameter (I have negligible parasitic impedance) compared to dual_fit_eis using element_type set to 'RQ.' I believe removing this element will improve my fits and get me more accurate results. Is there a way to do this?
Hybrid DRT is much better than the other libraries I have used because of its robust and fast initial value and model prediction, the option for explicitly specifying custom ECMs (like R-RC-HN-RQ, for example) in dual_fit_eis in order to prevent overfitting and reduce the parameter space, would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks in advance!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: