Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Incorrect Simplelist Thumbnail Width/Height Settings #1889

Open
Heklaterriol opened this issue Jan 19, 2025 · 3 comments
Open

Incorrect Simplelist Thumbnail Width/Height Settings #1889

Heklaterriol opened this issue Jan 19, 2025 · 3 comments

Comments

@Heklaterriol
Copy link
Contributor

The settings "Max. Width of Thumbnails" in "Basic Setting" is faulty:

  1. the set width results in only half of the width in the frontend (default - responsive style)

The settings:
Image

results in:
Image

  1. The images height is fixed to "auto", regardless of the value of "Max. Height of Thumbnails"
    At the moment Max. Width of Thumbnails = 500px and Max. Height of Thumbnails = 50px results in an image of 250px width and a proportional auto height.

  2. The settings have no effect in the simplelist in table - legacy layout

@jojo12
Copy link
Contributor

jojo12 commented Jan 19, 2025

I think the "image" issue is very difficultu with diverse factors:
legacy vs responsive
simplelist view image vs detail view image
mod_jem_banner image/mod_jem_teaser image/mod_jem_wide image
thumbnails vs flyer

@mckillo
Copy link
Collaborator

mckillo commented Jan 19, 2025

When you change the Max Height or Max Width of Thumbnails, you must delete the images in the small folders to apply the new resolutions.

Image

@mckillo
Copy link
Collaborator

mckillo commented Jan 19, 2025

JEM doesn't have an option in Housekeeping to delete all thumbnails from the small folders. This could be a feature to include in the next JEM and which will be used by the admin when changing the max resolution of images in the settings.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants