Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fos resistance #31

Open
AntonS-bio opened this issue Nov 29, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Fos resistance #31

AntonS-bio opened this issue Nov 29, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@AntonS-bio
Copy link

I've noticed that program rarely reports resistance to fosfomycin (Fcyn) in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Given that vast majority of Kp samples carry FosA gene, is there another determinant apart from gene presence that is used for resistance identification? I couldn't find anything in code.

regard,
Anton

@katholt
Copy link
Collaborator

katholt commented Nov 30, 2019

As you note, fosA is a core gene carried by ~all K. pneumoniae, however at wildtype expresssion levels, this chromosomal gene results in a fosfomycin MIC of only 16-32 mg/L, which is below the breakpoint for clinically relevant resistance. In contrast, the mobile form of fosA, which was captured from the K. pneumonie genome by IS26 and is under control of a strong IS26 promoter, is typically expressed at high enough levels to confer clinically relevant resistance.
The same is true of oqxAB and fluoroquinolone resistance (wildtype expression level of the chromosomal core gene confers ciprofloxacin MIC only 0.008-0.25 mg/L, below the breakpoints).
So, as all K. pneumoniae genomes carry these loci, simply detecting fosA or oqxAB in the assembly is not sufficient to assume resistance (deviation from wildtype), hence we do not report it.
In future releases we may address this by

  • attempting to differentiate the mobile (ACQUIRED) from intrinsic forms of these loci, but this will require extensive testing and would always be dependent on the quality of the input genome assemblies
  • add a column confirming the presence/absence of CORE genes of interest (fosA, oqxAB, mrk operon, etc).

@AntonS-bio
Copy link
Author

This makes sense. As you suggest, an option or column that allows selective identification of intrinsic and acquired resistance would be very useful.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants