Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DTSU666 - missing total energy values #16

Open
ciejj opened this issue Jan 19, 2024 · 6 comments · May be fixed by #34
Open

DTSU666 - missing total energy values #16

ciejj opened this issue Jan 19, 2024 · 6 comments · May be fixed by #34
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ciejj
Copy link

ciejj commented Jan 19, 2024

First of all thank you for this plugin :)

After connecting and configuring DTSU666 (3P4W) the values of: Negative active total energy and Positive active total energy were stuck at 0.0 kwH.

I have done some digging, and changing the value in this line to 0x401e fixes the issue

@lmatula
Copy link
Owner

lmatula commented Jan 21, 2024

Whitch version of DTSU666 do you have?
read the comment in code, i've tested two type of dtsu666, and is't containt valid data this register. maybe must create to third type of meter kind

@ciejj
Copy link
Author

ciejj commented Jan 30, 2024

My version is: DTSU666 3x230/400V 5(80)A 4P 313280

@pvdeye
Copy link

pvdeye commented May 8, 2024

I also have this problem?

@pvdeye
Copy link

pvdeye commented May 8, 2024

Is there already a solution here?

@lmatula lmatula added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 20, 2024
@thkn1973
Copy link

thkn1973 commented Dec 2, 2024

I also need the positive and negativ energy
comes there an update?
Thx

@maslyankov maslyankov linked a pull request Jan 8, 2025 that will close this issue
@maslyankov
Copy link

Issue is solved with above PR as soon as it is merged.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants