How to provide a human-readable name of an inline Union type?

[Alex Wolf (sascha-wolf)]

To make a long story short: we've a custom ID scalar that we use to denote that a given property is a unique ID for a given model:

@friendlyName("{name}.id", M)
@doc("Unique ID for a {name}", M)
scalar ID<M extends {}> extends string;

This works great for cases like the following but breaks down for unions:

// (Thing.id)
// Unique ID for a Thing
@path thingID: ID<Thing>

// (undefined.id)
// Unique ID for a undefined
@path parentID: ID<Thing | AnotherThing>

I've scoured the documentation, even the TypeScript type definitions but to no avail. Am I right to assume that this is currently not supported?

[Timothee Guerin (timotheeguerin)]

Yeah it is not possible today, {name} interpolate the internal name of the M type which anonymous union don't have.Which emitter are you using? openapi3?
We do have some issue to provide a more standard name generation for templates, for example the json schema emitter does a better job at finding a name automatically.

[Alex Wolf (sascha-wolf)]

Yes, we're using the OpenAPI3 emitter.

[Alex Wolf (sascha-wolf)]

For the time being it'd even be helpful to be able to include the verbatim definition in there. Yes, Thing | AnotherThing.id isn't quite correct but Unique ID for a Thing | AnotherThing would already be helpful.