forked from nationalparkservice/WRST-climate-futures
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Copy pathVegetation-report.Rmd
197 lines (118 loc) · 12.6 KB
/
Vegetation-report.Rmd
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
---
title: "Climate futures for Wrangell-St. Elias National Park & Preserve"
author: "Amber Runyon, Ph.D - NPS Climate Change Response Program"
date: "8/13/2021"
output:
word_document:
reference_docx: "template.docx"
html_document:
df_print: paged
subtitle: Vegetation
bibliography: Data/files-for-knitting/bibliography.bib
toc: true
theme: united
---
```{r setup, include=FALSE}
knitr::opts_chunk$set(echo = TRUE)
```
```{r Initials, echo=FALSE, message=FALSE, warning=FALSE}
rm(list = ls())
library(stars);library(dplyr);library(ggplot2);library(ggthemes);library(viridis);library(here);library(ggrepel);library(rlang);library(units);library(knitr)
working.dir <- "C:/Users/achildress/Documents/wrst_temp"
data.dir = paste0(working.dir,"/Data")
plot.dir = paste0(working.dir, "/Plots")
# data.dir <- paste(working.dir, "Data", area, sep="/")
# plot.dir
historical.period <- as.character(seq(1950,1999,1))
future.period <- as.character(seq(2025,2055,1))
daymet.period <- as.character(seq(1980,2016,1))
GCMs <- c("inmcm4.rcp85","ACCESS1-3.rcp45","CanESM2.rcp85")
CFs <- c("Climate Future 1", "Climate Future 2", "Climate Future 3")
cols <- c("#12045C","#ffcccc","#E10720")
CF_GCM <- data.frame(CF=CFs,GCM=GCMs,CF_col=cols)
group = "vegetation"
```
## Introduction
<!-- Will be the same for all resources -->
Plausible climate futures for Wrangell-St. Elias National Park & Preserve (WRST) are expressed in terms of future (2025-2055) change relative to late-20<sup>th</sup>-century conditions (1950-1999). The climate information summarized here is from projected, gridded data, downscaled at 15km (BCSD; @Mizukami2021). Due to the size and complex geography of the park, climate futures are presented spatially, with timeseries of the spatial means across each area shown to characterize the dynamics. The four geographic areas are distinct climate and ecological zones in WRST (Figure 1).
![**Figure 1.** Geographic areas in WRST used for climate analysis.](Data/figures/WRST_area_map.png){width="431"}
Climate futures are from projections from ten global climate model (GCMs), run under two contrastic greenhouse gas emissions scenarios (RCP4.5 and RCP8.5). The GCMs were selected for their model performance in Alaska @Mizukami2021. They represent a range of plausible future climates for the park over the coming decades.From these 20 projections (10 GCMs x 2 emissions scenarios), three divergent climate futures were chosen that characterized the range of uncertainty across all trajectories. The uncertainty was measured across the climate metrics that park and subject-matter experts expressed as the most consequential for resources at WRST (Figure 2). Those *consequential* climate metrics are listed in Table 1, below. See (@Runyon2021)[https://irma.nps.gov/DataStore/Reference/Profile/2286672] and (@Lawrence2021)[https://link.springer.com/epdf/10.1007/s10584-021-03169-y?sharing_token=MufjWsIQwncLzXdQ2awm9Pe4RwlQNchNByi7wbcMAY48-OL9-_d-75TukkQDtC_QgmuzZqcD52_phTlMsDeKUZ3hlN2p-e60d1ZHtYKyTYClg80yAvWfomsQIPT76_NhyeJSwspZWfdbrpOv4l1egfAD8shVTBGLvZL2_N5-GaQ%3D] for details on model selection methodology.
![**Figure 2.** Projected changes in average annual temperature and precipitation for the 20 projections. Points represent differences between average values for the 3-decade period 2025–2055 and 1950–1999 for each GCM. Circled GCM/RCP combinations are projections selected for climate futures. Circle color corresponds with the color of the climate futures and scenarios used throughout this document.](Data/figures/Scatterplot-TvsP.png)
```{r CF color table,eval=TRUE,echo=FALSE}
writeLines("td, th { padding : 6px } th { background-color : brown ; color : white; border : 1px solid white; } td { color : brown ; border : 1px solid brown }", con = "mystyle.css")
knitr::kable(CF_GCM[,1:2], format="markdown", caption=paste0("**Table 1.**","GCMs selected as climate futures. Climate future colors are consistent throughout this document."))
# colorSub=nameVector(rainbow(10), c(letters[1:5], LETTERS[1:5])),
# row_color_by="B")
```
```{r T1 metrics, eval=TRUE, echo=FALSE}
t1.metrics = data.frame(Metric=c("Seasonal (DJF, MAM, JJA, SON) average temperature",
"Seasonal (DJF, MAM, JJA, SON) average precipitation",
"Maximum annual snow depth",
"Shoulder season (MAM & SON) snow",
"Water balance"))
kable(t1.metrics, caption = paste0("**Table 2.**","Climate metrics representing most challenging climate sensitivities for resources at WRST."))
```
## `r group`
Park and subject matter experts identified the following metrics as sensitivities for vegetation in WRST (Table 2). These metrics are evaluated for each of the three climate futures in the subsequent sections of this packet. Use this table when determining implications ((resource implications homework)[]) of each of the climate futures on each resource to identify metrics to review.
```{r resource-sensitivities-table, echo=FALSE, results='asis'}
metrics=read.csv(paste0("Data/files-for-knitting/", group, "-metrics.csv"))
kable(metrics, caption = paste0("Climate sensitivities for ", group, " resources"))
#needs to be reformatted
```
### Climate futures summary
The following table summarizes key climate features for each `r group` resource that are illustrated in figures and tables in this document.
[**Table 3.** Commonalities and differences among the climate futures.]
<!-- Insert CF summary table -->
### Resource-specific summaries
**Table 4.** Vegetation resources summary
![Climate futures by resource group](images/Resource-summary-ex.PNG)
## Climate futures
### Fundamental climate metrics
The following figures illustrate seasonal change (1950-1999 vs 2025-2055) in basic climate metrics. Seasons are characterized as yearly quarters: DJF = December, January, February; MAM = March, April, May; JJA = June, July, August; SON = September, October, November.
Unless specified, average values displayed as change values in dotplots or annual averages in timeseries plots are averaged across all grid cells in the geographies represented in each map.
```{r monthly summary, eval=TRUE, echo=FALSE}
monthly.summary = read.csv("Data/files-for-knitting/Monthly_summary.csv")
kable(monthly.summary, caption = paste0("**Table 5.**","WRST climate futures (average for 3-decade period 2025–2055), expressed in terms of change relative to the historical period (1950–1999), with negative values indicating declines. The “Historical” column represents the 1950-1999 average value for each metric."))
```
![**Figure 3.** Seasonal change in maximum temperature](Data/figures/seasonal_tmaxF.png)
![**Figure 4.** Seasonal change in minimum temperature](Data/figures/seasonal_tminF.png)
![**Figure 5.** Seasonal change in total precipitation](Data/figures/seasonal_precipIn.png)
The following figure panels illustrate change in the specified metric between the historical period (1950-1999) and each climate future (2025-2055).Timeseries plots compare recent climate trends using observed, gridded climate data (Daymet) from 1980-2016 to climate futures. The bottom-right tables summarize the mean annual values for the historical period (Daymet) and each climate future. The historical period is represented as an absolute value and climate futures are change values, so negative values indicate a decline in the metrics (e.g., Average temperature = 20 (\u00B0F), the climate futures are increasing 2-6 (\u00B0F))
![**Figure 6.** Average annual temperature.](Data/figures/Annual.tmeanF_ANN.png)
![**Figure 7.** Average annual precipitation. ](Data/figures/Annual.precipIn_ANN.png)
![**Figure 8.** Average annual water balance, calculated as precipitation - total evapotranspiration (AET + PET).)](Data/figures/water.balance_ANN.png)
### Threshold metrics
The following plots represent annual averages for threshold exceedance metrics in different regions of WRST (see Figure 1). The values represent the average of all 15-km grid cells within each region. Timeseries plots compare recent climate trends using observed, gridded climate data (Daymet) from 1980-2016 to climate futures. The bottom-right tables summarize the mean annual values for the historical period (Daymet) and each climate future. The historical period is represented as an absolute value and climate futures are change values, so negative values indicate a decline in the metrics.
Freeze-thaw is the number of freeze-thaw cycles per year, calculated as days when the maximum temperature >34 (\u00B0F) and the minimum temperature <28 (\u00B0F).
Tmin < 32 (\u00B0F) is the number of days per year when the minimum temperature is below 32 (\u00B0F).
Tmax > 68 (\u00B0F) is the number of days per year when the maximum temperature is above 68 (\u00B0F).
Tmin > 32 (\u00B0F) in DJF is the number of days per year during December-February when the minimum temperature is above 32 (\u00B0F).
Precip > 0.5 inches is the number of days per year when precipitation is greater than 0.5 inches.
![**Figure 9.** WRST mountains threshold exceedance](Data/figures/wrst_mtns_ts-stack.png)
![**Figure 10.** Copper plateau threshold exceedance](Data/figures/copper_plateau_ts-stack.png)
![**Figure 11.** Coastal mountains threshold exceedance](Data/figures/coastal_mtns_ts-stack.png)
![**Figure 12.** Eastern coast threshold exceedance](Data/figures/eastern_coast_ts-stack.png)
### Snow metrics
The following figure panels illustrate change in the specified metric between the historical period (1950-1999) and each climate future (2025-2055).Timeseries plots compare recent climate trends using observed, gridded climate data (Daymet) from 1980-2016 to climate futures. The bottom-right tables summarize the mean annual values for the historical period (Daymet) and each climate future. The historical period is represented as an absolute value and climate futures are change values, so negative values indicate a decline in the metrics.
The snow metrics were calculated using a variable infiltration capacity (VIC) model on the same 15-km grid, provided by NCAR @Mizukami2021.
![**Figure 13.** Average proportion of precipitation falling as snow calculated as snow water equivalent (SWE) / precipitation.](Data/figures/SWE.precip_ANN.png)
![**Figure 14.** Average proportion of precipitation falling as snow calculated as snow water equivalent (SWE) / precipitation..](Data/figures/max.SWE_ANN.png)
![**Figure 15.** Shoulder-season snow, calculated as the average snow water equivalent (SWE) in the months of March-May and September-November.](Data/figures/MAMSON.SWE_ANN.png)
he following plots show yearly daily runoff and snow water equivalent (SWE) values for each year. The historical period is observed, gridded climate data (Daymet) from 1980-2016; climate future are from 2025-2055. Figures are produed for the different regions of WRST (see Figure 1) and values are averages of all 15-km grid cells within each region. These metrics were calculated using a variable infiltration capacity (VIC) model on the same 15-km grid, provided by NCAR @Mizukami2021.
![**Figure 16.**](Data/figures/wrst_mtns_SWE-runoff.png)
![**Figure 17.**](Data/figures/copper_plateau_SWE-runoff.png)
![**Figure 18.**](Data/figures/coastal_mtns_SWE-runoff.png)
![**Figure 19.**](Data/figures/eastern_coast_SWE-runoff.png)
### Soils and permafrost metrics
The following figure panels illustrate change in the specified metric between the historical period (1950-1999) and each climate future (2025-2055).Timeseries plots compare recent climate trends using observed, gridded climate data (Daymet) from 1980-2016 to climate futures. The bottom-right tables summarize the mean annual values for the historical period (Daymet) and each climate future. The historical period is represented as an absolute value and climate futures are change values, so negative values indicate a decline in the metrics.
The soil metrics were calculated using a variable infiltration capacity (VIC) model on the same 15-km grid, provided by NCAR @Mizukami2021.
![**Figure 20.** Average soil temperature calculated as the average of the first two soil temperature layers from the VIC energy balance model.](Data/figures/soil.temp_ANN.png)
<!-- Figure out how to center -->
Email [Amber Runyon]([email protected]) with questions about material in this document\
\
Code available at [WRST GitHub repository](https://github.com/nationalparkservice/WRST-climate-futures)\
\
Climate information developed in collaboration with [Jeremy Littell]([email protected]), U.S.G.S. Alaska Climate Adaptation Science Center\
\
Downscaled climate projections provided by Andrew Newman, National Center for Atmospheric Research @Mizukami2021\
\