We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Currently, if we set a canvas opacity, the value is propagated to all the children. The opacity should apply the composition, not to each child node.
Test case :
var mchild3 = Elements.Create("flexcanvas", { height: 150, width: 200, }); mchild3.color = "Moccasin"; mchild3.position = "relative"; mchild3.left = 60; mchild3.top = 80; mchild3.opacity = 0.7; document.canvas.add(mchild3); var mchild4 = Elements.Create("flexcanvas", { height: 40, width: 40, }); mchild4.color = "Crimson"; mchild4.position = "relative"; mchild4.left = -10; mchild4.top = -10; mchild3.add(mchild4);
In this example, we should not be able to see through the second canvas on the first one. (The composition of mchild3 and mchild4 should be "atomic")
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
paraboul
No branches or pull requests
Currently, if we set a canvas opacity, the value is propagated to all the children.
The opacity should apply the composition, not to each child node.
Test case :
In this example, we should not be able to see through the second canvas on the first one. (The composition of mchild3 and mchild4 should be "atomic")
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: