Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 3, 2021. It is now read-only.

coredns won't start after updates ? #53

Open
olberger opened this issue Oct 28, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

coredns won't start after updates ? #53

olberger opened this issue Oct 28, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@olberger
Copy link
Contributor

I've noticed tlat coredns doesn't seem to be starting with the latest minikube in tests I've made today:

NAMESPACE                NAME                                           READY   STATUS             RESTARTS   AGE
kube-system              pod/coredns-fb8b8dccf-7cp7q                    0/1     CrashLoopBackOff   22         68m
kube-system              pod/coredns-fb8b8dccf-pltdp                    0/1     CrashLoopBackOff   22         68m
...
NAMESPACE     NAME                                       READY   UP-TO-DATE   AVAILABLE   AGE
default       deployment.apps/antidote-web               1/1     1            1           19m
default       deployment.apps/nginx-ingress-controller   1/1     1            1           19m
default       deployment.apps/syringe                    1/1     1            1           19m
kube-system   deployment.apps/coredns                    0/2     2            0           68m

I'm using vagrant + libvirt...

Maybe the issue is other, but it happens that minikube just issued a new release...

Also, maybe the k8s version should be updated, as minikube seems to be in sync with 1.16 as per its release notes ?

Maybe the coredns service isn't used in Antidote, after all ?

Hope this helps.

@olberger
Copy link
Contributor Author

olberger commented Nov 4, 2019

Not sure which version of the box I was using, but I made another test with generic/ubuntu1804 and k8s 1.14.8 and this exhibits the problem...

Hth,

@olberger olberger changed the title coredns won't start with minikube v1.5.0 ? coredns won't start after updates ? Nov 4, 2019
@olberger
Copy link
Contributor Author

olberger commented Nov 4, 2019

Latest Minikube seem to be working fine on generic/ubuntu1604 in this respect.

@Mierdin
Copy link
Member

Mierdin commented May 7, 2020

Is this still a problem or can we close this? I have yet to see this myself, especially recently.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants