New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Storage of field-level coverage results #16

Closed

jpmckinney opened this issue May 5, 2021 · 1 comment

Labels

Member

jpmckinney commented May 5, 2021

Do we need to store all results of all checks, or would it be more efficient to store only when the result is 1 (or, only when the result is 0)?

(From this document)

jpmckinney added the question label

Member Author

jpmckinney commented Oct 26, 2021

Having read the code, the results are not stored as I had assumed.

Anyway, this question will come up again for #30

jpmckinney closed this as completed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment