You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current draft has introduced at least three brand new metadata parameters about openid4vp implementations.
These was introduced for the first time in the following openid4vp github issue:
peppelinux
changed the title
opneid4vp metadata including redirect_uris and request_uris sanification and presentation_definition
openid4vp metadata including redirect_uris and request_uris sanification and presentation_definition
Aug 17, 2024
I think an issue in the OID4VP github is needed for each new proposed metadata and as I understand it in the case of Italy the proposal is not to use the new parameters in the client_metadata request parameter anyhow and hence openid/OpenID4VP#17 (which is about the client_metadata request parameter) isn't too relevant?
I agree that we should have separate tracking issues for each proposed new metadata parameter. Then they can each be easily considered on their merits.
The current draft has introduced at least three brand new metadata parameters about openid4vp implementations.
These was introduced for the first time in the following openid4vp github issue:
openid/OpenID4VP#17 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: