Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Check functionality and stability of add_RES_constraints #1283

Open
ekatef opened this issue Jan 5, 2025 · 3 comments
Open

Check functionality and stability of add_RES_constraints #1283

ekatef opened this issue Jan 5, 2025 · 3 comments

Comments

@ekatef
Copy link
Member

ekatef commented Jan 5, 2025

Currently, we have a warning when running add_RES_constraints which mentions that some unexpected results can occur if temporal clustering is applied or due to an unexpected change of technologies.

Describe the feature you'd like to see

There is a need to clarify which particular problems can be expected and implement fixes for them. #1276 implements refactoring changes for add_RES_constraints which could be probably helpful in this investigation.

@ekatef
Copy link
Member Author

ekatef commented Jan 5, 2025

@yerbol-akhmetov I know you have been working a lot on this part. May you have any insights on particular issues which can be expected for add_RES_constraints?

@yerbol-akhmetov
Copy link
Collaborator

@yerbol-akhmetov I know you have been working a lot on this part. May you have any insights on particular issues which can be expected for add_RES_constraints?

Hi, @ekatef. The constraint worked well when we last checked it. It was working as intended. But I have not checked it after merge with sector coupled model. I am not quite sure about the warning there.

@ekatef
Copy link
Member Author

ekatef commented Jan 5, 2025

@yerbol-akhmetov I know you have been working a lot on this part. May you have any insights on particular issues which can be expected for add_RES_constraints?

Hi, @ekatef. The constraint worked well when we last checked it. It was working as intended. But I have not checked it after merge with sector coupled model. I am not quite sure about the warning there.

Thanks a lot for the explanation. Great to hear that there is no known pitfalls there, and a great point for testing with the sector-coupled model. I also have an impression that the constraint works pretty well after having tested it for linopy PR. So, hopefully we may be able to remove the warning after a couple more additional tests.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants