-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 207
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Check functionality and stability of add_RES_constraints #1283
Comments
@yerbol-akhmetov I know you have been working a lot on this part. May you have any insights on particular issues which can be expected for |
Hi, @ekatef. The constraint worked well when we last checked it. It was working as intended. But I have not checked it after merge with sector coupled model. I am not quite sure about the warning there. |
Thanks a lot for the explanation. Great to hear that there is no known pitfalls there, and a great point for testing with the sector-coupled model. I also have an impression that the constraint works pretty well after having tested it for linopy PR. So, hopefully we may be able to remove the warning after a couple more additional tests. |
Currently, we have a warning when running
add_RES_constraints
which mentions that some unexpected results can occur if temporal clustering is applied or due to an unexpected change of technologies.Describe the feature you'd like to see
There is a need to clarify which particular problems can be expected and implement fixes for them. #1276 implements refactoring changes for
add_RES_constraints
which could be probably helpful in this investigation.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: