Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve UX for manually add assets #1792

Open
JakeUrban opened this issue Jan 14, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

Improve UX for manually add assets #1792

JakeUrban opened this issue Jan 14, 2025 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@JakeUrban
Copy link
Contributor

"curious if we've thought about trying to get rid of the "add an asset" vs "add manually" choice in this flow?
I've seen users get confused by this because they don't know when to search manually or how it's different from the regular search.
Under the hood, one does an asset search and the other does either a contract id or issuer lookup depending on if you enter a G or C key.
I think we can pretty much do the same thing while using one input by parsing the input into: asset code or contract id or public key and doing the search that matches the input type." - @aristidesstaffieri

@aristidesstaffieri
Copy link
Contributor

"curious if we've thought about trying to get rid of the "add an asset" vs "add manually" choice in this flow? I've seen users get confused by this because they don't know when to search manually or how it's different from the regular search. Under the hood, one does an asset search and the other does either a contract id or issuer lookup depending on if you enter a G or C key. I think we can pretty much do the same thing while using one input by parsing the input into: asset code or contract id or public key and doing the search that matches the input type." - @aristidesstaffieri

Yeah absolutely, this has been flagged as an improvement for a long time but never prioritized. There is no reason why we can't do this now. I think along with this, we should improve our ability to reject contracts that are not sep41 compliant. Right now we accept any valid contract ID.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants