Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

📍 Specify exact ClaimableBalanceID.v0 arithmatic #1512

Closed
JFWooten4 opened this issue Aug 1, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

📍 Specify exact ClaimableBalanceID.v0 arithmatic #1512

JFWooten4 opened this issue Aug 1, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@JFWooten4
Copy link
Contributor

The existing specification for CB IDs does not explicitly specify how data types are originated, concatenated, or encoded. This has created confusion among other implementation gaps:

of the `OperationID`, which is created with the `type` `ENVELOPE_TYPE_OP_ID`, `sourceAccount`

It's be stellar to know exactly how to precompute values, prevent collisions, and streamline identification!

@JFWooten4
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing in #1516

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant