-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 383
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
git reset fails sometimes when connecting to gitea forge #4558
Comments
This is how it looks on healthy
Woodpecker
and so on |
I have changed our gitea instance to use a postgres database instead of the default sqlite, and the problems seems to have gone away. I am however not sure how that changes anything, as the problem was in the fetch, and I think that does not hit the database? I am stumped... |
I think so. What do you have between Server and Agent, as well as between clone container and Gitea? |
Component
server, agent
Describe the bug
I have been using woodpecker-CI for multiple years now in our company, and we rarely had any issues.
Ever since two days ago, pipelines sometimes fail with an error connecting to the gitea forge:
Restarting the pipeline often fixes the issue.
I am failing to find any reasons to why this is happening. It seems to connect to gitea normally before (it loads the pipeline, runs the first fetch, and it works on restart). I have updated to woodpecker-next and the issue stays the same. I have not updated neither woodpecker or gitea in the past few days (just a few weeks ago).
I had a similiar issue half a year ago, when my renovate-bot would open many pull requests simultaneously and it would fail with a "Cannot read username" message.
Is this a problem with woodpecker? Am I running into a gitea rate limit? I am not running fail2ban on my host.
Steps to reproduce
Hard to reproduce sadly :(
Expected behavior
No response
System Info
Additional context
No response
Validations
next
version already [https://woodpecker-ci.org/faq#which-version-of-woodpecker-should-i-use]The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: