-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 79
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rename ufs related coupling modes; replace nems with ufs #418
Conversation
* change nems to ufs * update docs
@@ -68,15 +68,15 @@ subroutine esmFldsExchange_nems(gcomp, phase, rc) | |||
if (chkerr(rc,__LINE__,u_FILE_u)) return | |||
|
|||
! Set maptype according to coupling_mode | |||
if (trim(coupling_mode) == 'nems_orig' .or. trim(coupling_mode) == 'nems_orig_data') then | |||
if (trim(coupling_mode) == 'ufs.nfrac' .or. trim(coupling_mode) == 'ufs.nfrac.aoflux') then | |||
maptype = mapnstod_consf |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you double check these. I see ufs.nfrac, ufs.nfrac.aoflux and ufs.frac.aoflux - are all of these correct?
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ module med_internalstate_mod | |||
character(len=CS), public :: glc_name = '' | |||
|
|||
! Coupling mode | |||
character(len=CS), public :: coupling_mode ! valid values are [cesm,nems_orig,nems_frac,nems_orig_data,hafs,nems_frac_aoflux,nems_frac_aoflux_sbs] | |||
character(len=CS), public :: coupling_mode ! valid values are [cesm,ufs.nfrac,ufs.frac,ufs.nfrac.aoflux,ufs.frac.aoflux,hafs] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess this answers my previous question.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, the original names have just been replaced with more explicit names that reflect how or when a mode is used in ufs.
Description of changes
Includes changes recently committed to https://github.com/NOAA-EMC/CMEPS
Specific notes
The non-CESM coupling modes have been clarified and renamed to use "ufs" instead of "nems".
The
esmFldsExchange_nems_mod
has be renamed toesmFields_Exchange_ufs_mod
Documentation has been updated.
Contributors other than yourself, if any:
CMEPS Issues Fixed (include github issue #):
Are changes expected to change answers? (specify if bfb, different at roundoff, more substantial)
Any User Interface Changes (namelist or namelist defaults changes)?
Testing performed
Please describe the tests along with the target model and machine(s)
If possible, please also added hashes that were used in the testing
Changes have been tested and committed in UFS.