You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Until we get a better way for annotating this, we need to add the capability for annotating the preferred namespace in case there are ontology collisions. For example if my ontology has a class Person which extends foaf:Person, the schema Person should resolve to whatever the ns URI is declared.
This should be added in the documentation. There may be more than one preferred ns (as you can have an ontology network)
By default, the ontology that is extending the general ontologies should be used.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Until we get a better way for annotating this, we need to add the capability for annotating the preferred namespace in case there are ontology collisions. For example if my ontology has a class Person which extends foaf:Person, the schema Person should resolve to whatever the ns URI is declared.
This should be added in the documentation. There may be more than one preferred ns (as you can have an ontology network)
By default, the ontology that is extending the general ontologies should be used.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: