feat: add Check Technologies to GBFS systems

[Rens660]

No description provided.

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[josee-sabourin]

Welcome @Rens660! Thank you for this contribution!

[richfab]

Hi @Rens660,
I'm Fabien, Community Developer Advocate at MobilityData.
Feel free to share here if you're planning to implement changes from v3.0-RC2.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you!

[futuretap]

Hi @Rens660, it looks like each individual city feed returns all vehicles countrywide. E.g. the Delft feed also returns mopeds from Rotterdam, Den Haag, Amsterdam etc.
Can you fix that?

[richfab]

Hi @duvenagep and @Rens660,

I'm following up on @futuretap's comment.

The data issue is that some Check vehicles are duplicated across multiple GBFS feeds. For example, the Delft feed contains vehicles from Rotterdam and vice versa (see visualization).

This does not follow the best practices of the GBFS spec: "The gbfs.json discovery file SHOULD represent a single system or geographic area in which vehicles are operated."

This is a missed opportunity for Check as trip planners might not display your vehicles if they are duplicated across multiple feeds.

Potential solutions:

• List only vehicles located in the city area in the feed.
• Aggregate the feeds that constitute a city cluster as defined in your FAQ (see screenshot below).

I am available for any questions.
Thanks in advance 🙏