Skip to content

[Translation] Add Traditional Chinese (Taiwan) for ASVS 5.0.0 - #3428

Draft
d2ogg wants to merge 6 commits into
OWASP:v5.0.0from
d2ogg:translate_5.0.0_zh-tw
Draft

d2ogg wants to merge 6 commits into
OWASP:v5.0.0from
d2ogg:translate_5.0.0_zh-tw

Conversation

@d2ogg

@d2ogg d2ogg commented Oct 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This Pull Request relates to issue #3427. Please carry out discussion in that issue.

Adds a Traditional Chinese (Taiwan) translation in 5.0/zh-tw/: 27 Markdown files and the header YAML, covering all 345 requirements. Based on stable v5.0.0 English at 180622b1329ee7ed349c9f5ce5e14fa91f42c359, reusing the Simplified Chinese text with Taiwan terminology localization and English comparison.

Only 5.0/zh-tw/ is added. Existing translations, build tools, and global metadata are unchanged. Initial conversion and review were AI-assisted; independent Taiwan community review is welcome before merging.

Validation

  • Unmodified official translation validator: 27/27 Markdown files pass.
  • Markdownlint with the repository configuration: pass.
  • Requirement IDs, order, levels, and numeric security values checked.
  • Appendix C: 14 tables checked for approval status, algorithm identifiers, KDF parameters, equivalent strengths, and KEX parameters.
  • Credits, local references, code spans, and parsed links/images checked.
  • Full external-link CI and PDF/DOCX visual checks remain pending; generated outputs are not included.

Notes

  • Please confirm zh-tw naming in [Translation] Traditional Chinese (Taiwan, zh-tw) translation for ASVS 5.0.0 #3427.
  • Appendix C retains the existing Simplified Chinese correction from obsolete 6.2.9 to actual 11.2.3 in the CCM-8 note. No security parameter is changed.
  • Appendix B preserves the full stable-English reference list; the JWT reference uses OWASP's current general JWT Cheat Sheet because the old Java-specific URL returns 404.

This PR is a draft pending directory naming and Taiwan terminology review.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant