Fix minor typos. - #3
Conversation
pombredanne
left a comment
pombredanne
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks! I made a few minor comments.
| Alternatively Packages could be extracted to an independent PackagedCode library. | ||
|
|
||
| The changes will minimal impact onthe layout of the scan results. Here is an | ||
| The changes will minimise impact on the layout of the scan results. Here is an |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should we stay with US English there? ;) e.g. "minimize"?
|
|
||
| - A tool that generates attribution documentation may be interested | ||
| first by components and second by licenses or packages references. | ||
| - A tool that generates attribution documentation may interest |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
IMHO may be interested by components first is still valid: I am talking about the the interest or focus of a tool there
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@pombredanne umm, that should work too.
But, "may be interested first by components and second by licenses or packages references.", seemed a tad odd.
But, again. English isn't my mother tongue, so you are a better judge. 😅
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Well it is no mine either. Let's go with:
A tool that generates attribution documentation may focus first on components and second on licenses or packages references.
Signed-off-by: Kartik Sibal <kartiksibal@gmail.com>
|
Thanks! |
2 participants
@pombredanne Some off the top errors I could find.
Signed-off-by: Kartik Sibal kartiksibal@gmail.com