2024 02 13 prototype version 3 updates

[christophercameron-ixd]

PR Checklist

• Set yourself as the Assignee
• Tag anyone you would like to review, or @forms-design or @forms-devs
• Fill in the template below

---

What

I’ve updated the documentation to cover the differences between the previous version (2) and this version (3). It includes reasons for why we made changes, and quotes if available.
Fixed navigation, typos and missing information.

For more information about what was done, see the trello card.

How to review

1. Syntactic: Spelling, grammar, etc.
2. Semantic: Do you agree with the changes?
3. Is there any information missed, or reasoning for a change you can remember that isn’t covered?
4. Are we happy for the research document links I have added to be included?

Who can review

Anyone from the team, but have asked for specific review from content and user research.

[oliverquinlan]

Not sure the links to the user research docs here are the right ones. They both lead to team documentation about how we were going to run the sessions.

The analysis for this was documented in Mural: https://app.mural.co/t/gaap0347/m/gaap0347/1654781687567/0191bfd6e08b968770d46ffb9419b5ef2ef12a91?sender=ae8920e3-ae89-493e-af47-566a135db4be

The playback link might be more user friendly for reference here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1vwLW90GR0rRnBGtiRKi4BkGe1w7N3_Ez/view?usp=sharing

[oliverquinlan]

@christophercameron-ixd I'm relatively new to reviewing things on Github so sorry if I've not approached this right. I looked at the changes and saw the links I've commented on, however when I look at the branch normally viewing the whole thing the UR sections look fine, well documented and the correct links. Please could you check my comment but I think this is all fine. Ping me when you have and I will approve the request.

[oliverquinlan]

Thanks happy with changing this to reference the UR docs on github so we can keep the links to further documentation in one place.

[oliverquinlan]

Approved