Fix: signal handler musn't depend on the event loop #15325
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Only a limited set of POSIX functions are signal safe, and the system functions that the event loop implementations can rely on isn't in the list (e.g. epoll, kevent, malloc, ...).
Now, the writer side of the pipe is blocking, so we should never reach a nonblocking case that would trigger an event loop wait, but going to the event loop may still be doing far too much or dangerous things: an event loop might not be available (e.g. bare thread) and it might be lazily allocated (signal unsafe).