-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
backport: Merge bitcoin#22619, 22593 #6071
Conversation
d1bf903
to
969a9ed
Compare
This pull request has conflicts, please rebase. |
38bf780
to
bb5cfcc
Compare
e5bc737
to
0020e72
Compare
Hello @UdjinM6 , @knst , @PastaPastaPasta for review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
pls see UdjinM6@35b39cf
doc/release-notes-22570.md
Outdated
|
||
* On startup, the list of banned hosts and networks (via `setban` RPC) in | ||
`banlist.dat` is ignored and only `banlist.json` is considered. Dash Core | ||
version 22.x is the only version that can read `banlist.dat` and also write |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
22570 has been already released with version Dash Core v20: #5574
without release notes, too late to update it now.
DNM 22603
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
utACK 26ec2e4
This pull request has conflicts, please rebase. |
had to rebase , requesting re-review |
86fb13f
to
431a82f
Compare
16c39fe
to
f9bfc35
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
utACK a6ec9bc
Hello @PastaPastaPasta, requesting review |
…ing conversion in functional test framework 5a1bef6 test: refactor: remove binascii from test_framework (Zero-1729) Pull request description: This PR continues the work started in PR bitcoin#22593, regarding using the `bytes` built-in module. In this PR specifically, instances of `binascii`'s methods `hexlify`, `unhexlify`, and `a2b_hex` have been replaced with the build-in `bytes` module's `hex` and `fromhex` methods where appropriate to make bytes <-> hex-string conversions consistent across the functional test files and test_framework. Additionally, certain changes made are based on the following assumption: ``` bytes.hex(data) == binascii.hexlify(data).decode() bytes.hex(data).encode() == binascii.hexlify(data) ``` Ran the functional tests to ensure behaviour is still consistent and changes didn't break existing tests. closes bitcoin#22605 ACKs for top commit: theStack: Code-review ACK 5a1bef6 🔢 Tree-SHA512: 8f28076cf0580a0d02a156f3e1e94c9badd3d41c3fbdfb2b87cd8a761dde2c94faa5f4c448d6747b1ccc9111c3ef1a1d7b42a11c806b241fa0410b7529e2445f Signed-off-by: Vijay <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Vijay <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
utACK ad840ec
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
utACK ad840ec
bitcoin backports