Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: do not build derivations in parallel on GH #6371

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 29, 2024

Conversation

UdjinM6
Copy link

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 commented Oct 29, 2024

Issue being fixed or feature implemented

Should fix GH Guix builds

develop: https://github.com/UdjinM6/dash/actions/runs/11563155278
develop + this patch merged into it: https://github.com/UdjinM6/dash/actions/runs/11562899245

more info https://github.com/dashpay/dash/blob/develop/contrib/guix/README.md#controlling-the-number-of-threads-used-by-guix-build-commands

What was done?

How Has This Been Tested?

Breaking Changes

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have assigned this pull request to a milestone (for repository code-owners and collaborators only)

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 added this to the 22 milestone Oct 29, 2024
@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 changed the title fix(ci): do not build derivations in parallel on GH ci: do not build derivations in parallel on GH Oct 29, 2024
Copy link
Member

@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK 8abe646

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 closed this Oct 29, 2024
@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta merged commit e3a0fce into dashpay:develop Oct 29, 2024
25 of 35 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants