opinionated readme refactor #68
Draft
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I EXPECT CUSTOMIZATION OF THIS IDEA 😀
problem: "wow that's so much information creating a feature is very complicated i wont bother" duue to very long readme with no images to make it skimmable
this is an ATTEMPT to sort of change that so that the BASIC information is still there about how to make a feature and publish it and list it on the index, but without all the extra "too much" information and instead direct to more detailed advanced resources.
also this adds a "remove this part" and a demo readme at the bottom. which idk if that's what you want but hey 🤷♀️ its an idea