Skip to content

Upgrade Super-linter to v7.4.0 - #10587

Merged
danroth27 merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
v-zhiwen:codex/update-super-linter-v7.4.0
Sep 28, 2026
Merged

danroth27 merged 3 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
v-zhiwen:codex/update-super-linter-v7.4.0

Conversation

@v-zhiwen

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Updates the pinned Super-linter SHA to v7.4.0 to fix the Gitleaks checksum false positive in #10562.

Comment thread .github/workflows/super-linter.yml Outdated

@danroth27 danroth27 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The upgrade to 7.4 is fine, but I think we want to use the slim linter instead to speed up CI a bit.

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot review overview

🟢 Approval recommended

The pinned commit is valid and references the Super-Linter slim v7.4.0 image as intended.

Review effort: Balanced
Findings: None

What changed in this PR

Updates Super-Linter to v7.4.0 to address the Gitleaks checksum false positive affecting release artifacts.

Changes:

  • Pins Super-Linter slim v7.4.0 by immutable commit SHA.
  • Updates the accompanying version comment.
File Description
.github/​workflows/​super-linter.yml Updates the Super-Linter action pin to v7.4.0.

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

@danroth27 danroth27 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:shipit:

@danroth27
danroth27 merged commit bbdc0d3 into dotnet:main Sep 28, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants